Over a Million and a Half U.S. Families Live on $2 Per Person Per Day — Or Less

The World Bank draws one of its “extreme poverty” lines at $2.00 per person per day — the equivalent of $2,190 a year for a family of three.

This is a level of deprivation we associate with villages in sub-Saharan Africa or the slums of New Delhi. It’s about 12% of the Census Bureau’s official poverty threshold for the three-member family.

But by one measure, an estimated 1.65 million U.S. households with children were at or below the Bank’s threshold in 2011 — 4.3% of all households with children headed by someone who wasn’t elderly.

This is the headlined finding of a newly-published paper by sociologists Luke Shaefer and Kathryn Edin (yes, the same one whose work I used for my post on unwed fathers).

They came to their project from Edin’s earlier interview-intensive studies of poor single-mother families. “She mentioned that she felt like she was going into more and more homes where there was really nothing in income,” Shaefer says.

So the two decided to find out how many families were in such straits and how they survived.

To do this, they analyzed years of data from the Census Bureau’s ongoing Survey of Income and Program Participation, using the Bank’s $2.00 a day threshold.

They started in 1996, just before states began implementing “welfare reform,” and ended in 2011, when the Great Recession was officially over, but not its effects on the labor market.

Various complex statistical maneuvers I won’t even try to account for. This paper is not for popular consumption.

What we need to know to understand the findings is that the Shaefer-Edin team looked at households in extreme poverty based first on their cash income, including what they received (or didn’t) from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program and the program it replaced.

They then sequentially added in the largest federal means-tested benefits — SNAP (the food stamp program), housing subsidies and refundable tax credits, i.e., the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit.

The results clearly document what the team refers to as “the virtual disappearance of a cash safety net for non-workers.” Also, I should add, for some low-wage workers without full-time, year round jobs.

In 1966, cash assistance lifted about 1.15 million families above the extreme poverty line in any given month. By mid-2011, it lifted only about 291,000.

Though means-tested benefits expanded over this period, they couldn’t offset the combined impacts of the deliberate shrinkage of welfare caseloads and the recessions and sluggish recoveries during the 2000s, including the last and biggest.

We see, for example, that extreme poverty among households with children increased by 50%, even when all the means-tested benefits are factored in.

For single-mother families — the single largest type in TANF — the extreme poverty rate increased by nearly 68%, again after adjustments for the means-tested benefits.

Leave them out and the increase soars to 229% — a clear reflection of the end of a cash assistance guarantee for extremely poor families.

On the brighter side, SNAP reduced extreme poverty among households with children by 48% in mid-2011. This is with the soon-to-expire benefits boost that was part of the Recovery Act.

Fold in the rest of the means-tested benefits and 2.38 million children lived in families where they and their parents had somewhat more than $2.00 a day to live on.

But 1.17 million children still didn’t.

No policymaker, I suppose, deliberately decided to let any of America’s children live at a poverty level defined as “extreme” for developing countries.

But our policymakers share bipartisan responsibility because they decided to focus anti-poverty efforts on “the working poor” and let families headed by parents with the greatest barriers to ongoing gainful employment fend for themselves.

We see this in the Census Bureau’s own poverty figures.

In the past two decades, Shaefer and Edin report, families in deep poverty, i.e., below 50% of the applicable threshold, have received substantially less aid from public programs, while those at 50% to 150% of the threshold have, on average, gotten more.

Thus, the team concludes, “our current major safety-net programs are blunting some of the hardship that … households [“at the very bottom”] would otherwise face. However, it would be wrong to conclude that the U.S. safety net is strong, or even adequate.”

We knew this, of course, but perhaps not how shockingly inadequate it is.

8 Responses to Over a Million and a Half U.S. Families Live on $2 Per Person Per Day — Or Less

  1. zoom314 says:

    Repubs/baggers in Congress don’t care if people who are poor or disabled live or die, just as long as it’s not on the publics dime, VOTE for Democrats to Congress in 2014 and only Democrats.

  2. dan maceda says:

    Where do these people live and what do they eat?

  3. Kathryn Baer says:

    Dan, I wish I knew. SNAP benefits clearly helped with the eating issue, though it’s not clear that all the families counted as extremely poor on the basis of cash income received them. But even with all the means-tested benefits, 613,000 families were still below the $2 per person, per day poverty line. The study doesn’t tell us how far above it the remainder were. Nor anything about where the families in the samples lived.

    We need an altogether different kind of study — or more likely, studies — to tell us how these families survive.

  4. Valarie says:

    As to Dan I think that we have to remember that there are many families who are essentially living “off the grid” in a sense. Family members take in other family members and share what little they have in terms of food and shelter but it is often not reported for fear of violating lease agreements or other government connected policies/programs. I lead a program that provides adult literacy and job readiness services and when our participants become comfortable these are the tales they share. I agree Kathryn that a completely different kind of study is required. I remember during the last census they reached out to community agencies like ours to help count those who might otherwise go uncounted and that kind of engagement is going to be important.

  5. […] 1. In the United States, 1,170,000 children live in families with less than $2.00 a day in income. From Poverty and Policy: […]

  6. […] yes. The efficacy of time limits, which have done such wonders for poor families since TANF replaced an indefinite-term cash […]

  7. […] who fall through the cracks. Furman has no specific suggestions here, just notes the Edin-Shaefer findings on families living on $2 or less per […]

  8. […] but deeply so, i.e., living on incomes less than half the poverty threshold or even the extreme $2.00 a day poverty. This is the second key […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s