September is Hunger Action Month — a campaign launched by Feeding America to get us involved in efforts to help end hunger in this country.
And hunger there surely is, as the latest food (in)security report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture shows.
Last year, nearly 1
74.9 million households sometimes — or often — didn’t have the resources to buy the food that all members needed “for an active, healthy life.” These are households USDA classifies as food insecure.
There were more of them than in 2010, but the percent increase isn’t statistically significant, USDA says.
The bigger news, I think, is that the number of households with very low food security, i.e., those in which at least one member sometimes scrimped on meals or skipped them altogether, rose to more than 6.8 million — 5.7% of all households surveyed.
This is statistically significant. And it puts the very low food security rate back up to where it was during the recession we’re still recovering from.
All told, nearly 16.9 million people sometimes didn’t have enough to eat. For adults, in the main, this typically meant hunger during seven months of the year — and for a few days during each of these months.
Drilling down a bit, we see that:
- Food insecurity afflicted 20.6% of households with children — nearly 8 million families.
- Children themselves were food insecure in slightly under half these households — and actually experienced hunger in 374,000 of them.
- Food insecurity rates were highest for single-mother families — 36.8% or more than 3.5 million families.
- More than 1.1 million of them — 11.6% — were so food insecure as to fall into the generally recurrent hunger category.
- Single-father households also had unusually high food insecurity rates — 24.9%. But there were far fewer of them.
The correlation with poverty is, of course, very high. So not surprisingly, we see significant race/ethnicity differences.
- Among black households, 25.1% were food insecure, as compared to 11.4% of white, non-Hispanic households.
- The very low food security, i.e., hunger, rate among black households was 10.5%, as compared to 4.6% for white, non-Hispanic households.
- The food insecurity rate for Hispanic households was 26.% and the very low food security rate 8.3%.
- Children themselves were food insecure in 14.6% of black households, as compared to 6.7% of white, non-Hispanic households.
- The child food insecurity rate for Hispanic households was 17.4%.
Well over 88% of food insecure households were poor enough to qualify for food stamps. The USDA report doesn’t tell us how many received them. It does, however, tell us how households below the program’s standard income eligibility ceiling fared.
On the one hand, a large majority managed to keep enough food on the table without food stamps for all of 2011.
The survey results don’t tell us how, though we might guess that free school meals played a part. Perhaps also the food pantries and other emergency sources that Feeding America’s network supplies.
On the other hand, nearly half (49.1%) of the households that received food stamps all year were nevertheless food insecure. And more than one in five (22.3%) were so food insecure that at least one member of the household didn’t always have enough — or anything — to eat.
The new Farm Bill the Senate passed would nevertheless reduce food stamp benefits for about half a million households.
The version pending in the House would do the same. It would also cut off all benefits for at least 1.8 million low-income people, plus free school meals for about 280,000 prospectively hungry children.
If we’re going to end hunger in America — a doable thing in this very wealthy country — the very least our elected representatives can do now is avoid making it worse.
Sad that anyone should have to say something so blatantly self-evident.