<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Are Those Folks Who Don&#8217;t Pay Federal Income Taxes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/who-are-those-folks-who-dont-pay-federal-income-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/who-are-those-folks-who-dont-pay-federal-income-taxes/</link>
	<description>Because it&#039;s better to light a candle than curse the darkness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andystaxes</title>
		<link>http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/who-are-those-folks-who-dont-pay-federal-income-taxes/#comment-6788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andystaxes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=5473#comment-6788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Dianne Feinstein&#039;s form letter she will &quot;express concerns to Congress&quot; or something to that effect.  Regardless, with the shrinking middle-class...error rate....fraud rate.....what&#039;s the difference? No one wants to be stuck supporting people who are purportedly &quot;poor&quot;.  There&#039;s such a thing as personal responsibility.  Looked genuine?  Couldn&#039;t we ALL make that excuse?  Like I said, we didn&#039;t go to fake ID school.  Not that I care what anyone does, but anybody who&#039;s reproductive age in this day and age has had more than ample access to birth control.  If they want to design their life in whatever fashion...their business entirely....I don&#039;t want to be penalized.  I&#039;m not the police or social welfare department. And quite frankly....I just plain old-fashioned....don&#039;t....f***ing....care.  I told Obama on my2k that everyone is a special interest nowadays.  We simply live in a whiny America.  Reform?  Unlikely.  Unless the current political expletive-deleteds that are now in Congress get scared they won&#039;t get re-elected.  If they really want the public at large to support EIC and ACTC then they need to redirect these payments to utilities, medical, food cards, well-baby care........people don&#039;t want to pay for Gucci bags and weekend holidays.  Sorry...but there are plenty of people who walk out of offices with $10,000 checks between EIC, returned fed income taxes, ACTC and five dependents (all with different last names) and jump in $50K autos, section 8 housing and food stamps.  To me, that spells fraud...or at best...the government stealing money from the taxpayers.  There are also others who ask their preparers, &quot;Should I tell my boss to gimme that raise or forget about it? Cuz I don&#039;t want my EIC affected.&quot;  To me, that spells laziness.  I will no longer do EIC or ACTC based on the professional and moral principle that I will not be charged $500 because others commit a crime or shortchange myself because of the additional time it takes to store all of the proper info for these people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Dianne Feinstein&#8217;s form letter she will &#8220;express concerns to Congress&#8221; or something to that effect.  Regardless, with the shrinking middle-class&#8230;error rate&#8230;.fraud rate&#8230;..what&#8217;s the difference? No one wants to be stuck supporting people who are purportedly &#8220;poor&#8221;.  There&#8217;s such a thing as personal responsibility.  Looked genuine?  Couldn&#8217;t we ALL make that excuse?  Like I said, we didn&#8217;t go to fake ID school.  Not that I care what anyone does, but anybody who&#8217;s reproductive age in this day and age has had more than ample access to birth control.  If they want to design their life in whatever fashion&#8230;their business entirely&#8230;.I don&#8217;t want to be penalized.  I&#8217;m not the police or social welfare department. And quite frankly&#8230;.I just plain old-fashioned&#8230;.don&#8217;t&#8230;.f***ing&#8230;.care.  I told Obama on my2k that everyone is a special interest nowadays.  We simply live in a whiny America.  Reform?  Unlikely.  Unless the current political expletive-deleteds that are now in Congress get scared they won&#8217;t get re-elected.  If they really want the public at large to support EIC and ACTC then they need to redirect these payments to utilities, medical, food cards, well-baby care&#8230;&#8230;..people don&#8217;t want to pay for Gucci bags and weekend holidays.  Sorry&#8230;but there are plenty of people who walk out of offices with $10,000 checks between EIC, returned fed income taxes, ACTC and five dependents (all with different last names) and jump in $50K autos, section 8 housing and food stamps.  To me, that spells fraud&#8230;or at best&#8230;the government stealing money from the taxpayers.  There are also others who ask their preparers, &#8220;Should I tell my boss to gimme that raise or forget about it? Cuz I don&#8217;t want my EIC affected.&#8221;  To me, that spells laziness.  I will no longer do EIC or ACTC based on the professional and moral principle that I will not be charged $500 because others commit a crime or shortchange myself because of the additional time it takes to store all of the proper info for these people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Baer</title>
		<link>http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/who-are-those-folks-who-dont-pay-federal-income-taxes/#comment-6785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathryn Baer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=5473#comment-6785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You’re right. There is a marriage penalty built into the EITC. The point I was making is that the Recovery Act mitigated the penalty and that Republicans don’t want to extend the tax credit in this form. Similarly, they want the refundable Child Tax Credit to revert to its pre-Recovery Act form. This would significantly reduce the benefit for low-income families—and altogether deny it to some.

Claiming the EITC is complicated, as you know well. The figures you’re citing are the estimated error rate, not the fraud rate. I understand that IRS is leaning on tax preparers like yourself. I rather doubt that you would be penalized if you accepted documentation that looked genuine, but wasn’t. Still, you’ve got the burden of keeping copies of the documents to protect yourself.

Perhaps there’s an opportunity for tax reform here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re right. There is a marriage penalty built into the EITC. The point I was making is that the Recovery Act mitigated the penalty and that Republicans don’t want to extend the tax credit in this form. Similarly, they want the refundable Child Tax Credit to revert to its pre-Recovery Act form. This would significantly reduce the benefit for low-income families—and altogether deny it to some.</p>
<p>Claiming the EITC is complicated, as you know well. The figures you’re citing are the estimated error rate, not the fraud rate. I understand that IRS is leaning on tax preparers like yourself. I rather doubt that you would be penalized if you accepted documentation that looked genuine, but wasn’t. Still, you’ve got the burden of keeping copies of the documents to protect yourself.</p>
<p>Perhaps there’s an opportunity for tax reform here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andystaxes</title>
		<link>http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/who-are-those-folks-who-dont-pay-federal-income-taxes/#comment-6784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andystaxes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=5473#comment-6784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EITC doesn&#039;t promote family values no matter what side of the political spectrum you&#039;re on.  The Tax Foundation reports that 61% of all tax filers are unmarried.  Because of EITC, those who are not married (family values) are encouraged NOT to do so.  Example:  a woman whose adjusted gross is $20K a year sharing two kids  with some guy whose adjusted gross is $50K a year, but NOT married to him, AND has the kids on her return qualifies for EIC and most likely gets somewhere near the maximum amount ($5112 for 2011).  Additionally all of her federal income taxes paid in during the year will be returned to her.  If she marries the guy, that puts them FAR over the income threshold for receiving EIC...bye bye 5 grand.  This is all too often the case out here in California, so I&#039;d like to know the definition of &quot;poverty&quot;....has a wide meaning these days.  

Not only that but apparently the IRS estimates that 23-28% of all EIC returns are fraudulent.  So now....we preparers are the police and will be charged a $500 penalty if EIC returns are not done according to specifications.  Sorry...but I don&#039;t see how tax fraud is MY problem.  I didn&#039;t go to fake ID school.  The result of this is preparers are weighing their options.....raise rates on all EIC clients, kick them all to the curb, refuse to do them at all, or refuse to do them unless they pay $500 for the return.

The IRS will have an interesting tax season this coming year.  My guess is EICers will be appearing en masse on their doorstep this tax season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EITC doesn&#8217;t promote family values no matter what side of the political spectrum you&#8217;re on.  The Tax Foundation reports that 61% of all tax filers are unmarried.  Because of EITC, those who are not married (family values) are encouraged NOT to do so.  Example:  a woman whose adjusted gross is $20K a year sharing two kids  with some guy whose adjusted gross is $50K a year, but NOT married to him, AND has the kids on her return qualifies for EIC and most likely gets somewhere near the maximum amount ($5112 for 2011).  Additionally all of her federal income taxes paid in during the year will be returned to her.  If she marries the guy, that puts them FAR over the income threshold for receiving EIC&#8230;bye bye 5 grand.  This is all too often the case out here in California, so I&#8217;d like to know the definition of &#8220;poverty&#8221;&#8230;.has a wide meaning these days.  </p>
<p>Not only that but apparently the IRS estimates that 23-28% of all EIC returns are fraudulent.  So now&#8230;.we preparers are the police and will be charged a $500 penalty if EIC returns are not done according to specifications.  Sorry&#8230;but I don&#8217;t see how tax fraud is MY problem.  I didn&#8217;t go to fake ID school.  The result of this is preparers are weighing their options&#8230;..raise rates on all EIC clients, kick them all to the curb, refuse to do them at all, or refuse to do them unless they pay $500 for the return.</p>
<p>The IRS will have an interesting tax season this coming year.  My guess is EICers will be appearing en masse on their doorstep this tax season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
